Peer-reviewed Articles
| <Previous Article |
TITLE:
What Does Height Really Mean? Part I: Introduction
AUTHOR(S):
Thomas H. Meyer, University of Connecticut
Daniel R. Roman, National Geodetic Survey
David B. Zilkoski, National Geodetic Survey
DOCUMENT TYPE: Article
Published in Surveying and Land Information Science, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 223-234.
See Part II and Part III of this four part series.
- Download the Document (PDF format - 482 K) - December 2004
- Tell a colleague about it.
ABSTRACT:
This is the first paper in a four-part series considering the fundamental question, “what
does the word height really mean?” National Geodetic Survey (NGS) is embarking on a height modernization
program in which, in the future, it will not be necessary for NGS to create new or maintain
old orthometric height benchmarks. In their stead, NGS will publish measured ellipsoid heights and
computed Helmert orthometric heights for survey markers. Consequently, practicing surveyors will
soon be confronted with coping with these changes and the differences between these types of height.
Indeed, although “height’” is a commonly used word, an exact definition of it can be difficult to find.
These articles will explore the various meanings of height as used in surveying and geodesy and present
a precise definition that is based on the physics of gravitational potential, along with current best
practices for using survey-grade GPS equipment for height measurement. Our goal is to review these
basic concepts so that surveyors can avoid potential pitfalls that may be created by the new NGS height
control era. The first paper reviews reference ellipsoids and mean sea level datums. The second paper
reviews the physics of heights culminating in a simple development of the geoid and explains why mean
sea level stations are not all at the same orthometric height. The third paper introduces geopotential
numbers and dynamic heights, explains the correction needed to account for the non-parallelism of
equipotential surfaces, and discusses how these corrections were used in NAVD 88. The fourth paper
presents a review of current best practices for heights measured with GPS.